Talk:Sideliners - Revision history

Astrozac at 05:42, 2 July 2015

2015-07-02T05:42:10Z

Infobroker: Undo revision 7544 by Astrozac (talk) - Broken Man arc has NOT concluded!

2014-06-14T19:10:10Z

Undo revision 7544 by Astrozac (talk) - Broken Man arc has NOT concluded!

Astrozac at 04:17, 14 June 2014

2014-06-14T04:17:00Z

Infobroker at 20:23, 6 March 2014

2014-03-06T20:23:27Z

Astrozac at 14:38, 5 March 2014

2014-03-05T14:38:14Z

Infobroker at 05:18, 5 March 2014

2014-03-05T05:18:24Z

Infobroker at 05:03, 5 March 2014

2014-03-05T05:03:27Z

Infobroker: move off topic item

2014-03-03T22:49:54Z

move off topic item

Astrozac at 22:44, 3 March 2014

2014-03-03T22:44:37Z

Infobroker at 22:22, 3 March 2014

2014-03-03T22:22:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:42, 2 July 2015
Line 38:		Line 38:

	:::::: Yea, I can see it from that perspective as well. Fell free to put it back. --[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 12:23, 6 March 2014 (PST)		:::::: Yea, I can see it from that perspective as well. Fell free to put it back. --[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 12:23, 6 March 2014 (PST)
		+	---------
		+
		+	Guess, I should have looked this over first before editing... Did you still want this page title with a capital S or have it like the group does with a lower case s? The only other one like this(so far) is the iGod, which with being the play on iPod works for me staying the way it is...
		+	--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 22:42, 1 July 2015 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 14 June 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:


−		+	What I am about to talk about is going to need one of these...
		+	{{spoilerAlert
		+	\|date = the conclusion of the Broken Man Arc
		+	}}

	What you have put on the page explains them perfectly. That's what counts. Besides the page title is a Title. Those need capitalization. Anyway that is my take on it.		What you have put on the page explains them perfectly. That's what counts. Besides the page title is a Title. Those need capitalization. Anyway that is my take on it.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 14 June 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:


−	~~What I am about to talk about is going to need one of these...~~	+
−	~~{{spoilerAlert~~
−	~~\|date = the conclusion of the Broken Man Arc~~
−	}}

	What you have put on the page explains them perfectly. That's what counts. Besides the page title is a Title. Those need capitalization. Anyway that is my take on it.		What you have put on the page explains them perfectly. That's what counts. Besides the page title is a Title. Those need capitalization. Anyway that is my take on it.

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 :::::They're one that straddles too many lines. One of the great things about the series...Can't wait to see how Winged Victory's story turns out.<br>
-I mainly use the term groups for a sub-category to show that they are a group (or team) of something, whether, civilians or villains for visitor reference. So they all get listed on the main Civilians page, but also in the sub-category. Yes, they're not an official team or group, but they provided their own unofficial classification name...
+:::::I mainly use the term groups for a sub-category to show that they are a group (or team) of something, whether, civilians or villains for visitor reference. So they all get listed on the main Civilians page, but also in the sub-category. Yes, they're not an official team or group, but they provided their own unofficial classification name.--[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 06:38, 5 March 2014 (PST)
---[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 06:38, 5 March 2014 (PST)
+:::::: Yea, I can see it from that perspective as well.  Fell free to put it back. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 12:23, 6 March 2014 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 5 March 2014
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:::: I tried an experiment with putting pretty much all this content on the category page for Sideliners. Once done, it felt all wrong and out of place. I am eliminating the category Sideliners. I will promote them directly on the main page in another manner. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 21:18, 4 March 2014 (PST)		:::: I tried an experiment with putting pretty much all this content on the category page for Sideliners. Once done, it felt all wrong and out of place. I am eliminating the category Sideliners. I will promote them directly on the main page in another manner. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 21:18, 4 March 2014 (PST)
		+
		+	:::::They're one that straddles too many lines. One of the great things about the series...Can't wait to see how Winged Victory's story turns out.<br>
		+	I mainly use the term groups for a sub-category to show that they are a group (or team) of something, whether, civilians or villains for visitor reference. So they all get listed on the main Civilians page, but also in the sub-category. Yes, they're not an official team or group, but they provided their own unofficial classification name...
		+
		+	--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 06:38, 5 March 2014 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 5 March 2014
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::I think its fine until the Broken Man's arc is over with to help readers and newcomers looking at the site. But for simple classification, I think they belong under Team and/or Civilian Groups category, even if they aren't a true "team." --[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (PST)		::I think its fine until the Broken Man's arc is over with to help readers and newcomers looking at the site. But for simple classification, I think they belong under Team and/or Civilian Groups category, even if they aren't a true "team." --[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (PST)

−	:::I'll reiterate, I don't think they see themselves as a group, they sure don't fit the confines of others that ~~you~~'ve put into the Civilian Groups category. This infers too much and rather than simplify, the double categorizing serves to confuse.--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 21:03, 4 March 2014 (PST)	+	::: I can see your viewpoint on this sorta, but I'll reiterate, I don't think they see themselves as a group, they sure don't fit the confines of others that we've put into the Civilian Groups category. This infers too much and rather than simplify, the double categorizing serves to confuse.--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 21:03, 4 March 2014 (PST)
		+
		+	:::: I tried an experiment with putting pretty much all this content on the category page for Sideliners. Once done, it felt all wrong and out of place. I am eliminating the category Sideliners. I will promote them directly on the main page in another manner. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 21:18, 4 March 2014 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 5 March 2014
Line 28:		Line 28:


−	I think its fine until the Broken Man's arc is over with to help readers and newcomers looking at the site. But for simple classification, I think they belong under Team and/or Civilian Groups category, even if they aren't a true "team." ~~<br>~~	+	::I think its fine until the Broken Man's arc is over with to help readers and newcomers looking at the site. But for simple classification, I think they belong under Team and/or Civilian Groups category, even if they aren't a true "team." --[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (PST)

−	--[[User:~~Astrozac~~\|~~Astrozac~~]] ([[User talk:~~Astrozac~~\|talk]]) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (PST)	+	:::I'll reiterate, I don't think they see themselves as a group, they sure don't fit the confines of others that you've put into the Civilian Groups category. This infers too much and rather than simplify, the double categorizing serves to confuse.--[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 21:03, 4 March 2014 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 3 March 2014
Line 29:		Line 29:

	I think its fine until the Broken Man's arc is over with to help readers and newcomers looking at the site. But for simple classification, I think they belong under Team and/or Civilian Groups category, even if they aren't a true "team." <br>		I think its fine until the Broken Man's arc is over with to help readers and newcomers looking at the site. But for simple classification, I think they belong under Team and/or Civilian Groups category, even if they aren't a true "team." <br>
−
−	Other side note, I still get those 500 server messages a lot. It happens almost randomly. Whether I've made a small edit or added discussion, it'll pop up. Heck, I can have looked at a page and go to click recent changes, it'll come up. Don't know if that helps you any.

	--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (PST)		--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 3 March 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:Discussion time... --[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 14:21, 3 March 2014 (PST)		:Discussion time... --[[User:Infobroker\|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker\|talk]]) 14:21, 3 March 2014 (PST)
		+
		+
		+	I think its fine until the Broken Man's arc is over with to help readers and newcomers looking at the site. But for simple classification, I think they belong under Team and/or Civilian Groups category, even if they aren't a true "team." <br>
		+
		+	Other side note, I still get those 500 server messages a lot. It happens almost randomly. Whether I've made a small edit or added discussion, it'll pop up. Heck, I can have looked at a page and go to click recent changes, it'll come up. Don't know if that helps you any.
		+
		+	--[[User:Astrozac\|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac\|talk]]) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (PST)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 08:42, 12 September 2013 (PDT)
-: I'm appending Sideliner as a category. It is there exclusively for characters that have been directly identified as somehow associated with the Sideliner "fraternity."  That means they have somehow linked to and have communication with Mattie and others.   It is not a category in  generic sense.  It is for any character that is explicitly mentioned in the pages of Astro City as a "sideliner."   Don't put random characters in the list, not even those that don't seem like they have or choose to have an alignment.  No I don't think of them as a team in any form.   There are like I said earlier, a fraternity or association.  But they are linked.
+:I'm appending Sideliner as a category. It is there exclusively for characters that have been directly identified as somehow associated with the Sideliner "fraternity."  That means they have somehow linked to and have communication with Mattie and others.   It is not a category in  generic sense.  It is for any character that is explicitly mentioned in the pages of Astro City as a "sideliner."   Don't put random characters in the list, not even those that don't seem like they have or choose to have an alignment.  No I don't think of them as a team in any form.   There are like I said earlier, a fraternity or association.  But they are linked.
-I am adding the "sideliner" entry to the sidebar because I sense that the Broken Man arc isn't done with them, and I want casual readers to be able to find out more about them in a very direct manner.
+:I am adding the "sideliner" entry to the sidebar because I sense that the Broken Man arc isn't done with them, and I want casual readers to be able to find out more about them in a very direct manner.
 :Discussion time... --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 14:21, 3 March 2014 (PST)