No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


* I've re-titled "Former" to "Inactive" and "Current" to "Active"  This in an attempt to avoid definitively labeling the status of a particular character.  It still feels "spongy" but short of putting speculation commentary around each and every member it seems to work, in a spongy kind of way. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 08:09, 30 September 2015 (PDT)
* I've re-titled "Former" to "Inactive" and "Current" to "Active"  This in an attempt to avoid definitively labeling the status of a particular character.  It still feels "spongy" but short of putting speculation commentary around each and every member it seems to work, in a spongy kind of way. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 08:09, 30 September 2015 (PDT)
== Headlines the old manual method and the auto-generated method ==
Note: This will probably be moved to the Community portal, but for now it is specific for this one particular call-out
The '''Headline''' entry that was manually here, ''"Honor Guard Routes Aliens"'' doesn't seem to be on the event list that is auto-generated. I may have missed it, so correct me if I am wrong.  But since it has yet to be built, how about not deleting the manual information unless you are also providing the mechanisms for generating the auto-magical entry.  If we get into that habit of assuming that future actions will make current information redundant, it will cause a bit of confusion, and lost info.  Because based on that pattern, and assuming I can get the time and motivation to formulate methods for well formatted and sorted queries, manual appearance lists would be going, going, gone too. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 11:00, 4 April 2017 (PDT)