Talk:Honor Guard: Difference between revisions
Infobroker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Infobroker (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* I've re-titled "Former" to "Inactive" and "Current" to "Active" This in an attempt to avoid definitively labeling the status of a particular character. It still feels "spongy" but short of putting speculation commentary around each and every member it seems to work, in a spongy kind of way. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 08:09, 30 September 2015 (PDT) | * I've re-titled "Former" to "Inactive" and "Current" to "Active" This in an attempt to avoid definitively labeling the status of a particular character. It still feels "spongy" but short of putting speculation commentary around each and every member it seems to work, in a spongy kind of way. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 08:09, 30 September 2015 (PDT) | ||
== Headlines the old manual method and the auto-generated method == | |||
Note: This will probably be moved to the Community portal, but for now it is specific for this one particular call-out | |||
The '''Headline''' entry that was manually here, ''"Honor Guard Routes Aliens"'' doesn't seem to be on the event list that is auto-generated. I may have missed it, so correct me if I am wrong. But since it has yet to be built, how about not deleting the manual information unless you are also providing the mechanisms for generating the auto-magical entry. If we get into that habit of assuming that future actions will make current information redundant, it will cause a bit of confusion, and lost info. Because based on that pattern, and assuming I can get the time and motivation to formulate methods for well formatted and sorted queries, manual appearance lists would be going, going, gone too. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 11:00, 4 April 2017 (PDT) | |||