Difference between revisions of "Talk:First Family Cases and Adventures"
Infobroker (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
- jb the ib - | - jb the ib - | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | The footnotes don't look bad(at least right now). Been looking here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFNAME#WP:REFNAME but can't figure out the multiple ref thing. The two events here come from same page, issue. I can't figure out how, it keeps flashing up invalid reference name. If I can I don't want to have extra footnotes, to the same things...<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Zack | ||
| + | --[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 12:10, 24 September 2013 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:10, 24 September 2013
I would strongly suggest and greatly encourage referencing the issue and if possible the page number for each entry on these lists. It will make it easier for others to expand/edit/fact check and for readers to have additional context.
Thanks.
--Infobroker (talk) 23:54, 23 September 2013 (PDT)
I played around with it some, not sure the best way to make it look. Can we do footnotes?
Will help when we get issue pages set up and go from there. I've got some notes and on the discussion page of 1:1 for issue templates, design, and naming...
--Astrozac (talk) 00:22, 24 September 2013 (PDT)
Sure, do what whatever feels comfortable and looks right.
- jb the ib -
The footnotes don't look bad(at least right now). Been looking here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFNAME#WP:REFNAME but can't figure out the multiple ref thing. The two events here come from same page, issue. I can't figure out how, it keeps flashing up invalid reference name. If I can I don't want to have extra footnotes, to the same things...
